Sit in my studio, paint, think, go take a bath, eat, think some more, change the music, write, paint a little, think. It’s a great job. It just doesn’t always pay too well. Rembrandt ultimately forfeited his swanky house and claimed bankruptcy. Gauguin was banned from France at one point. Not that he objected to his Tahitian exile as he clearly made the most of his situation. Pollock may have been able to create some wealth if he hadn’t died in a drunken car accident. Some artists have done very well such as Renaissance painters, sculptors and architects like Bernini and Raphael who enjoyed regular patronage. Marketeers like Koons, Hirst and Murakami are wealthy. These are the celebrated. What about the rest of us? There’s plenty of talent that isn’t awarded the necessary props from those that can catapult an artist into a spotlight that generates cash flow. For the unhighlighted this sadly means we have to get a job that pays regularly. This may or may not relate to our medium. It does mean less time in the studio, which, for me, translates into underdeveloped ideas. Not to mention a general dissatisfaction with my life and a sense I’m not doing something right.
There has always been a symbiotic relationship between the wealthy and the creative. We already know why artists need the wealthy. The wealthy, such as the Medici family who supported artists like Botticelli and Michelangelo, need to appear generous and altruistic to temper their ambition and greed in turn avoiding minor robbery to murder attempts and rioting. (The 99% are considering their options) It also doesn’t hurt that a great artist can document a family’s power and nobility for all time. The paintings Napoleon commissioned that hang at Versailles make him appear as formidable as he wished he had been. And taller. Artists make homely daughters of wealthy patrons palatable and the money keeps the artists in bread, wine and fetishes.
I haven’t indulged in any fetishes in a while. My lack of patronage has kept me painfully restricted to life on a ledge debating whether just falling off might be the better choice. At least it would be an interesting choice. Standing here merely fighting the cold wind waiting for an invitation inside where it’s warm and lovely is wearing me out. I succumb to my parents’ nodding approval of my alleged fortitude. I’m not that strong. I’m weak. Too weak to just let it all go and run amok! God, I’m dying to just run wild for a while. And I do mean dying. As in my soul shriveling to a fragile withered leaf devoid of even one squeeze of green succulence. I guess I don’t want to lose my house or ruin my credit score. One day, when this is all over and I’m solvent again I’ll be glad I held on? Jeezus, I really don’t know the answer to that. Why is it always some undisclosed magical day on the horizon that holds all milk and honey? What about today for Chrissakes? What if I don’t make it to that horizon line? Technically we never get there. So what the hell am I doing then?
I spend time in wealthier circles. I had a conversation with a man I knew in high school who lives a rat race 14 hour day existence. He’s done very well for himself, but has to keep it up to keep it all up. He colored with envy despite my comparative poverty because I do get days like today that are what I hope every day could be. I painted, ate, bathed, thought some thoughts, and painted some more, then went to an opening for someone else’s thinking and painting where we can all think about what we are looking at and discuss. I live alone and don’t have kids. I have a luxurious life. I did not have the money to go to NOLA this New Year’s with my cousins. I wouldn’t have minded watching my maize and blue win the Sugar Bowl! It was the soul of that city that was the real attraction and I bet I can get there another time when I can fully embrace all the flavor of New Orleans, not just as a celebrating football fan on Bourbon Street. I’m torn between what is considered grown-up behavior and what appears to be utter irresponsibility but is really creative exercise. I am creatively out of shape. While normies join Weight Watchers, I’m looking for a bit of debauchery. (Thinkin’ NOLA should stay on the to do list)
There is some discussion on creative genius whether it appears early or after years of study and practice. It’s both. The difference with the late person is constant dissatisfaction. A sense that a goal isn’t being reached. While some contemporaries hit their zenith at 25 and run with it for a while, I’m still waiting. My experience has shown me what great art looks like. I’m never sure I’ve made anything worthy of leaving the house let alone adorning noted gallery walls. Cezanne didn't hit the bigs until he was 50 and regularly shredded paintings out of frustration. In contrast Picasso, sure of his talent because it was established when a young ego can easily agree with such an assessment, progressed confidently with plenty of patronage to support his endeavors. I’ve had off and on patronage. The current economy has reduced support solely to family. I have a Theo in my parents, a cousin and a few close friends. I’d be out on the street without them. Basic needs are met. My challenge is in meeting creative needs so I can get on those walls.
My one unique attribute is I have a head for business. Despite the patronage I do have, it’s not enough. I still need a blech, choke, ugh, job. I’ve managed to begin to translate my Hollywood moment into some opportunities that are, gratefully, in the arts. I like that I’m resourceful and know how to manage the money I do have. My situation would be significantly worse if I didn’t. The challenge is to hold onto the assets I have ‘til that rapturous day of renewed solvency and still let loose enough to cultivate a painterly mind that generates work I’m excited about and proud of. Work that even I can tell is pretty good.
Like the spiritually devoted, one cannot sustain a meditative state. Life always intrudes. At tonight’s opening, I had a discussion with one of the facility’s directors about the band of painter ladies who take classes there. They are financially secure so their lives are strings of days like I had today, yet they find room to complain. RUFKM? Those of us who need that damn job dream of their situation. Is it possible we have it better? Isn’t life where the art comes from? What do I draw on if I’m not living? Why aren’t these ladies traveling, exploring, taking young lovers? They live close to the vest and adhere to social perimeters. It shows in the work. It may be well composed (often not) and nice to look at (often not), it isn’t provocative, it doesn’t challenge. The most brilliant minds I’m acquainted with in Detroit are constantly struggling for work/money. The comforting news there is I’m in very good company. I’d rather be in the mix not knowing where my next paycheck is coming from than have it so comfortable I don’t take any chances because I’m afraid of discomfort. I am afraid of not getting what I want. The only way to have a shot at getting what I want is to get out there and live. So I suppose I have the life I want and need to meet the goal that hasn’t manifested yet. Huh. Guess I’ll go soak in the tub after all this thinking and then maybe paint something.









